◆ MARKETING · 2026-09-21

Make the Content Anyway (Even When You Think It's Bad)

There is a video sitting in someone's drafts folder right now that would probably do really well. The person who made it has watched it back a dozen times, decided it isn't good enough, and moved on. The audience never got a chance to vote. The creator's inner critic voted for them, and the inner critic almost always votes no.

I have been that person. Many times.

The Thing That Actually Built an Audience

When I was building ArtResin, we figured out pretty early that YouTube tutorials were the engine. People searching for how to use epoxy resin were finding us, watching us, and becoming customers. But here is the honest version of that story: not every video was good. Some were rough. Some felt like we were figuring it out in real time, because we were. We shipped them anyway, and the audience grew. You can read more about how that whole strategy unfolded in how YouTube tutorials built ArtResin.

The lesson I keep coming back to is that the videos we were proudest of were not always the ones that connected. Sometimes the scrappier, more off-the-cuff piece would land harder than the one we spent three times as long on. You genuinely cannot predict it from the inside. You are too close to your own work to judge it fairly.

You Are a Terrible Judge of Your Own Work

This is not a criticism. It is just true, and it is true for almost every creative person I know. The same sensitivity that makes you care about quality is the thing that warps your perception of your own output. You notice every flaw. You remember how it felt to make it, which colours how you see the finished thing. Your audience comes to it fresh, without any of that baggage.

My own YouTube channel at youtube.com/@davezak is around 13,000 subscribers, and it is built on the same just-ship-it habit I developed at ArtResin. Some videos I have posted felt like throwaways to me. Concepts I thought were too simple, or production I thought was too loose. Those are often the ones people respond to the most. The comment section is a better judge of your work than you are. Let the audience vote.

The piece you almost didn't publish is often the one that connects.

Sporadic brilliance, or what you think is brilliance, does not build an audience. Consistency does. Volume does. Showing up repeatedly over time does. One great video a year gives people almost nothing to hold onto. A steady stream of good-enough videos gives the algorithm something to work with, gives your audience a reason to keep coming back, and gives you the reps you need to actually get better.

Publishing Is How You Improve

This is the part that people miss when they are stuck in the perfectionism loop. They think they need to get better before they publish. But publishing is the mechanism by which you get better. The reps compound. You make something, you put it out, you see what lands, you adjust, you make the next thing. That feedback loop does not exist if you never hit publish.

Private practice has its place, but there is no substitute for the real thing. Real feedback from a real audience doing real things with their time is information you cannot generate in a drafts folder. Every piece of content you publish is a small experiment. The data from that experiment makes you a better content maker, a better marketer, a better communicator. Sitting on your work gives you nothing.

The good news about the AI era is that the barrier to producing content is essentially zero now. You can draft, edit, generate visuals, cut a video, and have something ready to post faster than at any point in history. Which means the real differentiator is not access to tools. It is the willingness to actually publish, to be visible, and to do it again and again over months and years. That is the moat now. Showing up consistently when most people decide they are not ready yet.

A Practical Playbook for Shipping More

Lower the stakes first. Not every piece of content needs to be a production. A quick observation, a short clip, a behind-the-scenes moment: these things have value and they take a fraction of the time. Once you decouple "making content" from "making a big polished project," the volume gets easier.

Then commit to a cadence, and make it one you can actually hold. Weekly is better than daily if daily means burnout and silence by month two. The goal is a rhythm you can sustain for a year, not a sprint you can sustain for a week.

Hit publish before you feel ready. This is the whole thing. Feeling ready is not a real threshold you cross. It is just your inner critic setting a bar that moves every time you get close. Pick a deadline, finish the thing, and let it go. The discomfort fades fast once the thing is out in the world.

Then pay attention to what comes back. Comments, shares, the questions people ask. That is your real feedback, and it is worth far more than your own pre-publish anxiety.

I have spent years learning this the hard way, both at ArtResin and in my own creative work. The work I am most glad I made is the work I almost did not post. If any of this is useful to what you are building, you can see more of how I think about creative work and strategy at davidzak.com.

← All articles · About David Zak · The 40-year timeline